1. Call for papers: ESIL–SLADI Junior Faculty Forum (Florencja, październik 2026 r.)
W dniach 7-9 października br. we Florencji odbędzie się ESIL–SLADI Junior Faculty Forum. Zaproszenie do udziału w Forum skierowane jest do młodych badaczy do 5 lat po uzyskaniu stopnia doktora lub objęciu stanowiska adiunkta.
Więcej informacji o problematyce wydarzenia można znaleźć tutaj.
Zgłoszenia należy przesyłać do 30 kwietnia.
2. Call for submissions: Arms Exports Unbound? The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Gaza Case in Perspective
Völkerrechtsblog zaprasza do przesyłania refleksji w formie postów na bloga, wideo, prac artystycznych itd. na temat "Arms Exports Unbound? The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Gaza Case in Perspective".
Problematyka zgłoszeń powinna mieścić się w jednym z trzech tematów:
1. The Relationship between National Law and International Law
How does the decision reflect the relationship between national law, especially constitutional law, and international law on both the substantive and procedural levels? Do we see a recalibration or consolidation and on which level? Should we consider this as a weakening (or even the end) of the constitutional principle of “open statehood” (offene Staatlichkeit)? Do the current proceedings at the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court affect the jurisprudence of national courts? Can international legal norms (such as obligations under the Laws of Armed Conflict or the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide) become more effective through national courts? What is the role of jus cogens in this context?
2. The Political Economy of War
How does the decision reflect broader dynamics in the political economy of wars and conflict? What about other war materials? Is the decision an expression of Germany’s claimed “Staatsräson”, or of Germany’s new understanding of itself as a major security and foreign policy actor? How can the decision be explored through different legal frames? Why are arms exports cases often obscured? Why should this be a concern to international lawyers?
3. Comparative Perspectives
How does the GFCC’s decision compare to other decisions rendered by national (constitutional) courts (including but not limited to Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom)? Which lessons can be learned from a comparative perspective and for potential future litigants? Which commonalities and differences can be inferred?
Zgłoszenia należy nadsyłać do 30 kwietnia.
Więcej informacji można znaleźć tutaj.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz